Search Details

Word: personally (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Cliffie accused herself of selling out. "I felt that by conforming I was eradicating all that was me in my personality. By pretending to be cheerful when I wasn't or by adjusting the tenor of my conversation according to whom I was talking to, I thought I was being hypocritical. I fought all my compromises. I would stare at the person before whom I thought I was compromising myself until my eyes burned...

Author: By Anne DE Saint phalle, | Title: Harvard and Your Head | 9/18/1969 | See Source »

...learn all over again how to talk to normal people," he said. "I had to force myself to look a person in the eye and forget about myself while I tried to get inside his head. I had to schedule my day's activities according to The Man's requirements rather than to the cycle of my feelings...

Author: By Anne DE Saint phalle, | Title: Harvard and Your Head | 9/18/1969 | See Source »

...Sacred Heart in 1964, and did public relations for the Norfolk County Tuberculosis and Health Association before she got a job, through an employment agency, in Ted Kennedy's office. Discussing the inquest, she remarks: "Anonymity is the name of the game when you're a staff person, and it's very tough to all of a sudden be in the public...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Nation: WHO'S WHO AT THE KENNEDY INQUEST | 9/5/1969 | See Source »

...inquest is not a criminal trial. While a person may be indicted during a grand-jury proceeding, no one stands accused of a crime at an inquest. Attorneys for witnesses may not be present at a grand-jury proceeding. They are sometimes allowed at an inquest; yet they are not normally permitted to raise objections to the testimony, nor do they have the right to cross-examine witnesses. Thus, the inquest testimony can range widely, and counsel is forbidden to challenge any allegations that are made, no matter how farfetched. Kennedy's lawyers claim, however, that a recent Supreme...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Investigations: Kennedy's Legal Future | 9/5/1969 | See Source »

...lawyer. However, many law experts, including Harvard Law Professor Livingston Hall, believe that the Supreme Court's Miranda decision would not require the warnings in Kennedy's case. Hall points to a passage in the decision that reads: "There is no requirement that police stop a person who enters a police station and states that he wishes to confess a crime." Such volunteered statements, the decision goes on to say, are admissible as evidence at a trial. Nor is the inquest likely to raise an issue of double jeopardy, since the charge of leaving the scene...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Investigations: Kennedy's Legal Future | 9/5/1969 | See Source »

Previous | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | Next