Word: plaintiffs
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1920-1929
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Purina Soap Company gained a decision over the Oceanside Hotel Company in the Supreme Court of the Ames Competition in Langdell Hall last night. J. S. Myers 3L and C. C. Williams 3L, members of the Langdell-Marshall Law, Club, were the successful attorneys for the plaintiff. The defendant Hotel Company was represented by C. C. Cabot 3L and Nathaniel Thayer 3L, members of the Thayer Club. The case concerned the validity of a certain contract...
Tonight William Gresser 3L. and Melbourne Bergerman 3L., members of the Scott Club, will represent the plaintiff, and Morton Keeney 3L. and R. H. Hopkins 3L. will be the attorneys for the defendant. They will argue the case before the Honorable William Cushing Wait '82, Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts; the Honorable James Arnold Lowell '91, Judge of the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts; and the Honorable Franklin Tweed Hammond '92, Justice of the Superior Court of Massachusetts...
...merchants. Last week, Judge Paul J. McCormick mounted his U. S. District Court bench in the Federal Building at Los Angeles, and listened to the beginnings of US. v. the Pan-American Petroleum & Transport Co. (dominated by Mr. Doheny). There came before him: Lawyer Owen J. Roberts, for the plaintiff, who said he would show that the leases constituted a scheme between Messrs. Fall and Doheny, furtively and illegally contrived, and should therefore be canceled. Lawyer Frank J. Hogan, for the Doheny interests, who said he would show that no thought of profiteering lurked in the minds of Messrs. Fall...
...accept such decision. M. Adachi, speaking for Japan, charged the League with "proclaiming a state criminal without offering any solution to the difficulty". The solution, however, is not only offered, but is put in the most concrete form possible. It is simply a positive and final verdict against the plaintiff state...
...scientifically-suspected, self-feeding lamp, was upheld by ex-Supreme Court Justice New-burger, who, as referee, dismissed the proceedings. The opinion held that, although two illuminating experts had declared (without examination) that Tomadelli's lamp violated well-known scientific principles, the burden of proof was on the plaintiff (the Attorney General) to show that the representations of the promoter were consciously false and made with intent to deceive...