Search Details

Word: planet (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...attitudes toward environmental pollution are like our attitudes toward food: we keep shoving pollutants into the atmosphere with the same abandon that we shove junk food into our mouths, even though we know the results will probably be serious. Why are we not proactive when it comes to the planet? Our negligence could have a fatal impact not only on ourselves but also on billions of innocents. Matthew Hutchison West Hollywood, California...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters | 10/24/2005 | See Source »

...Peak Oil" theory fits nicely on a cocktail napkin. Its curve looks like this: Colonel Edwin Drake starts pumping crude in Pennsylvania in 1859. We've been pumping faster and faster ever since. Sooner or later, on this finite planet of ours, it just has to run out. U.S. production peaked in the 1970s. Global production will soon be on the downside of the same dismal curve...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Future of Energy: Viewpoints: It's the End of Oil / Oil Is Here to Stay | 10/23/2005 | See Source »

...price of oil has always fluctuated. In inflation-adjusted dollars, it was higher in the early '80s than it is today. Extraction technologies continue to improve much faster than supply horizons recede. We've got the right know-how and the right planet. What we lack is the political will...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Future of Energy: Viewpoints: It's the End of Oil / Oil Is Here to Stay | 10/23/2005 | See Source »

Conserving energy helps save the planet, but it also saves you money. The average household spends around $1,300 a year to heat and power the home and $2,800 keeping its two cars fueled up. But prices keep rising: heating is expected to jump 50% for some homeowners this winter, and gasoline is up 25% from a year ago. Here's how to save 10% to 50% of your green by going green...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Future of Energy: How to Save $$$ Now | 10/23/2005 | See Source »

...asks us to sacrifice "four for the planet"--four incandescent 100-watt bulbs, to be replaced with 23-watt compact fluorescent bulbs. A 100-watter burns through $35.04 in energy over three years, while a 23-watter costs $8.06. A fluorescent bulb costs $11 compared with 75˘ for an incandescent but lasts more than 13 times as long. Total annual savings for switching four lights, counting the cost of the bulbs...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Future of Energy: How to Save $$$ Now | 10/23/2005 | See Source »

Previous | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | Next