Search Details

Word: popkin (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

When the press and the public returned to the courtroom, Garrity's face was obscured by a copy of the Crimson transcript. Placing it aside, he announced his decision: Popkin was found in contempt and sentenced to a maximum of 18 months in prison, or until he agreed to answer the unanswered inquiries...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin: The Limits of Academic Privilege | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...confinement was not to be punishment, Garrity stressed, but a "sanction designed to compel answers" from Popkin. He added that Popkin had "the key in your pocket" to end the sentence at any time by consenting to provide the information...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin: The Limits of Academic Privilege | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

Excluded from the hearing, reporters waited on the wooden benches of the bankruptcy court next door, analyzing the Crimson transcript. And as they waited, Popkin was again being found in contempt, and Massachusetts U. S. Attorney Joseph L. Tauro was walking rapidly to the courtroom from his office at the end of the hall with copies of the Crimson under...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin: The Limits of Academic Privilege | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...merry-go-round took one more turn, to the First Circuit Court of Appeals on the 15th floor of the same building. Briefs submitted by attorneys for Popkin and for the government both relied heavily upon the issue of a scholar's First Amendment privilege to confidential sources; Popkin's brief held, with supporting affidavits from several fellow scholars and previous court decisions, that such a right is vital to academic freedom and progress, while the government's denied that any such right existed...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin: The Limits of Academic Privilege | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...Appeals Court's decision, entered May 3, affirmed part of the lower court's judgment and vacated others. "Even if the questions put to (Popkin) have not been demonstrated to be relevant to the grand jury's inquiry, this would not justify his refusals to answer," the court wrote. And it decided further that "the reason for the claimed (scholarly) privilege lies not in the importance of protecting the officials and other sources per se but in the importance of preserving the flow of their communications via scholars to the public domain. This underlying rationale falls short of immunizing...

Author: By Richard J. Meislin, | Title: Popkin: The Limits of Academic Privilege | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

Previous | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | Next