Word: pravda
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...your Sept. 1 issue . . . you set down that the editor of the official Soviet publication Pravda in effect received his information (regarding the American press) from me. This is untrue. . . . You state that the editor's name is Zaslavsky. I do not know him, do not believe I have ever even met him, and no communications of any kind have ever passed between...
Unsightly Role. Pravda soon joined the attack. What annoyed Pravda most: Zhebrak's heretical belief that there is no difference between Soviet and non-Soviet science.* "Zhebrak as a Soviet scientist," cried Pravda, "should have unmasked the class meaning of the struggle which is taking place around questions of genetics. But blinded by bourgeois prejudices, by detestable fawning on bourgeois science, he has adopted the attitude of the enemy's camp. . . . It turns out that there is a so-called pure science for Zhebrak. . . . It appears that there is no progressive Soviet biological science; there is no reactionary...
...Pravda assailed General, Marshall for creating a "diplomatic war" in the U. N. arena, and joined with the Russian press yesterday in blasting U. S. foreign policy in line with last week's speech by Andrel Y. Vishinsky before the U.N. General Assembly...
...Pravda would make as much sense as Eaton if it concluded that Americans were wicked because their name was derived from Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian and, therefore, a Fascist beast. Not even Pravda would try that. Eaton's article drew an angry and effective answer from Alexander Kerensky, who has been fighting the Soviet Government since the Bolsheviks kicked him out of the presidency of Russia 30 years ago. Wrote Kerensky in last week's New Leader...
...year history of the Soviet Union, philosophical quarrels have sometimes had fatal results. Long before he was tried for alleged treason and executed, Nikolai Bukharin had been attacked for philosophical deviation. But Bukharin never recanted. Aleksandrov did, and last week Pravda reported: "Aleksandrov fully agreed with the criticism, acknowledged that his book had serious failures and mistakes, and agreed that the whole organization of a new scientific work in the branch of philosophy should be fundamentally changed...