Word: privacyã
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...will enable you to chime into abortion debates with enlightened comments like, “Actually, the privacy language in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) is not as novel as one has been led to believe—in fact, the discussion of a constitutional ‘right to privacy?? dates back to an 1890 Harvard Law Review article by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis.” Notice in particular the use of explicit dates and the indefinite fourth-person referent “one” to get the full pompous effect that you?...
...Brown University Emergency Medical Services, there was no evidence that any event attendee had used ecstasy.” The same UCS resolution said it was “highly unethical” that O’Reilly neglected to edit the video footage and “preserve privacy?? for the students. “People were acting with a reasonable expectation of privacy amongst their peers, so to see it on the news two days later was shocking and more than a little off-putting,” Margolick said. “Lots of students...
...state legislatures lively debate could weigh the social costs and benefits of the procedure in a reasoned (perhaps scientific) manner, and talk of the “right to privacy?? or “abortion as murder” might decline a bit. All passions would not die down unless everyone can agree on exactly when life begins, but an improvement would be possible...
Obviously, you say, it’s because Michael Jackson is a celebrity. And celebrities don’t have privacy??they give that up when they get famous. Now, maybe I’m stretching here, but I have a feeling that most of us would envision lost privacy in terms of an airbrushed photo on the cover of Us Weekly, maybe a shout-out or two on ET. But not a haggard mugshot taken at the Santa Barbara County Jail—no, some things should be off-limits even in the realm of celebrity...
...HUPD and other campus police departments will not admit the error of their ways, the courts and the Massachusetts legislature need to see to it that they have no choice. Harvard’s top priority ought to be protecting the campus community, not ensuring the “privacy?? of those accused of serious criminal misconduct just because many happen to be Harvard students. If Jeanne had known about the history of violent crime, she might still be alive today...