Word: profs
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Department of Landscape Architecture has been the subject of an extensive review by a special committee under chairmanship of Prof. Frederick E. Smith. This Committee report was completed in June of 1975. The Smith Committee looked at landscape architecture as a profession and the role that a school at Harvard should occupy in educating landscape architecture professionals. It made detailed and specific recommendations. In general, this Committee endorses the Smith Report. Its emphasis on professionalism, project-oriented teaching and interdisciplinary co-operation is very consonant with the Committee's own view of appropriate policies for the Harvard Graduate School...
...that's really super. Here's the deal. My philosophy prof says that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. But Margaret, she's my roomie, and I think it's a crock. What is your theory on this ontogeny-phylogeny business...
...starting date back to early September would help immeasurably. Of course, I've heard that the green flies of Maine are much less ferocious in September than June, and the Science Center isn't about to displace Bermuda as the Western Hemisphere's next great resort, but really, prof, a Cambridge autumn ain't all that...
...fact is that neither Professor Kistiakowsky nor Professor Feld have ever seen, let alone read, the report which is the subject of your article and their comments; such knowledge as they believe themselves to possess stems from garbled and in part misleading newspaper leaks. Yet ignorance does not deter Prof. Feld for "discounting" the report and Prof. Kistiakowsky from dismissing it as a "red herring." Which raises serious questions about their judgment, not to speak of the value of their views on the work in which I happened to have engaged. --Richard Pipes Baird Professor of History
...Crimson is putting similar social pressure on Prof. Bernard Davis. They are distorting Davis's statements until anyone would find them objectionable and then calling him a racist. Davis's letter to The Crimson (May 19) seems highly articulate and rational; why dispute him on an emotional level? Again, in a thinking society can we condone the repression of ideas...