Search Details

Word: pseudonym (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1910-1919
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Each essay is to be typewritten and not over 2,000 words in length, and handed to A. G. Aldis '17, Randolph 2, before December 10. A few copies of the book may be obtained from him. The review should be signed by a pseudonym, and an envelope with his name on the outside, containing the real name of the author with his permanent address enclosed, is also to be sent...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRIZE OF $35 FOR REVIEW | 11/15/1916 | See Source »

...Each play should be signed with a pseudonym only and accompanied by a sealed envelope bearing on the outside the title of the play with the pseudonym, and containing the name of the play, the author's real name and address. These envelopes will be kept by the president until the judges have made their decision...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: DRAMATISTS HAVE THIS WEEK | 10/9/1916 | See Source »

...Each play must be signed with a pseudonym only, and accompanied by a sealed envelope bearing on the outside the title of the play with the pseudonym and containing a paper bearing the name of the play and the author's real name and address. These envelopes will be retained by the president until the judges have made their decision...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: AUTHORS HAVE TWO WEEKS | 9/29/1916 | See Source »

...college. Theses should not be over ten thousand words in length, should be typewritten in duplicate, and both copies sent to Chuion R. Woodruff, Secretary of the National Municipal League, North American Building, Philadelphia, Pa., signed by a pseulonym. Accompanying this should be sent a sealed envelope containing the pseudonym, real name, age, class, college, and residence of the competitor...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Prize Competition Closes March 15 | 3/2/1916 | See Source »

...Monthly's leading article on "Our Wavering Paternalism" is interesting and provocative. It makes us think, and it moves us to reply. The author has a lot of good ideas, though he suggests no constructive plan of reform. One regrets that he feels it necessary to crouch under a pseudonym: we should like it better if he signed his name, better still if he would stand on his feet in that Forum which he scorns and meet his opponents face to face. For his tone is sneering, and some of his statements are debatable. There are many who would like...

Author: By F. SCHENCK ., | Title: Good Specimen of Monthly | 5/18/1915 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next