Word: publishing
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
This week the Vietnamese daily Hoa Binh plans to publish the first of 30 installments of the transcript, purchased from a South Vietnamese lieutenant colonel who saw a chance to profit by the example of the Pentagon papers. Though Minh has long cast himself as a man untainted by involvement with the U.S. in general and with the blood of the Ngos in particular, the Diem document supports a fact well established in the Pentagon papers: that Americans had been in contact with Minh's group before the coup. It also implies that Minh knew that the brothers were...
...York Times for 23 years. Thus it was surprising that when the Times fought the Pentagon papers case up to the Supreme Court, the venerable Wall Street firm played no part. The reason, as TIME learned last week: Lord, Day & Lord felt strongly that the Times should not publish the classified material, and the attorneys ultimately refused to take the case...
...Eisenhower Administration, Brownell also supervised the drafting of the current classification regulations. Beyond the conflict-of-interest problem, members of the law firm felt, as Loeb confirmed last week, that they had to consider the question of whether to inform the Government of the Times's intention to publish the Pentagon papers...
...that some of my brethren are apparently willing to hold that the publication of news may sometimes be enjoined. Such a holding would make a shambles of the First Amendment. Both the history and language of the amendment support the view that the press must be left free to publish news, whatever the source, with out censorship, injunctions or prior restraints...
Endangered Negotiations. The Post's scenario before the Court of Appeals in Washington was slightly different. Solicitor General Griswold argued that the "integrity of the institution of the presidency" was at stake in the Post case and implied that if the press were free to publish classified material on general principle, such sensitive international negotiations as the SALT talks might be endangered. The court was unimpressed and ruled 7-2 that Griswold had failed to make a case. The next day the Government lost its bid for a second review, again 7-2. The majority opinion declared tartly...