Search Details

Word: question (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1900-1909
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...free lance contributions, and that only on the present occasion have some graduates imputed to it an editorial or official character. That such an imputation would be made, could not be foreseen. There never has been an expression of "editorial" opinion in the Magazine; and the article in question was printed in the Graduate's Window as an indication that it was in no sense authoritative. WILLIAM R. THAYER, Editor...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Communication | 12/21/1905 | See Source »

...interesting, but one-sided debate, the Juniors last evening defeated the Seniors in the second contest of the interclass series. The winning team supported the negative side of the question, "Resolved, That if it were possible a reasonable property qualification for the exercise of the municipal franchise in the United States would be desirable...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: JUNIORS DEFEATED SENIORS | 12/21/1905 | See Source »

...rebuttal speeches the Juniors had a distinct advantage. They summed up their arguments well, and showed the weakness of the affirmative in getting at the root of the question...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: JUNIORS DEFEATED SENIORS | 12/21/1905 | See Source »

...question for debate, submitted by the Seniors, is: "Resolved, That if it were possible a reasonable property qualification for the exercise of the municipal franchise in the United States would be desirable." In this debate the Senior team, which will maintain the affirmative, will speak in the following order: J. W. Plaisted, A. N. Holcombe, J. W. Appel. In the rebuttals, however, Appel will speak second, and Holcombe last. R. L. Hale has been appointed alternate. The order of the Junior speakers, who have chosen to support the negative, is: R. E. Gish, A. B. Church, A. H. Elder...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: SECOND INTERCLASS DEBATE | 12/20/1905 | See Source »

...rebuttal for the affirmative P. McClanahan said: Does this game really teach men to do things? Some things, yes; but not those things for which a university should stand. Football does cause loyalty to an ideal, but not the proper ideal. Our opponents say the danger is a question of bumps and bruises. It makes a difference where these bruises come. This whole matter hinges on the question: Why does a man come to college after all? Surely not to play football, and spend time in the hospital. Our opponents say that football is a player's whole-heared work...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WON THE DEBATE | 12/16/1905 | See Source »

Previous | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | Next