Search Details

Word: questioned (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1990-1999
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

When people ask this question, they don't really want or expect more than a one or two word reply, usually an adjective best reserved for fellowship applications: fulfilling, inspiring, perhaps challenging for the even-handed. People usually don't stick around long enough to ask you a follow-up and if they do it usually only requires another few monosyllabic proper names and places...

Author: By Dafna V. Hochman, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Remembering the Real World | 10/1/1999 | See Source »

...question asked the candidates if they thought Cambridge's universities were giving enough resources to the school system...

Author: By Edward B. Colby, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: School Committee Candidates Look to End Disparity | 10/1/1999 | See Source »

...that Way" actually steals the show at several key party scenes. But--alas! never fear!--like any movie featuring a song by Britney Spears--you already know the ending. We all know the ending. And that is the beauty of Drive Me Crazy, as of its ancestors, and without question, the many descendents sure to follow...

Author: By Deirdre Mask, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: TGIF + Britney Spears = Tiger Beat Heaven | 10/1/1999 | See Source »

...Once, Bradley was a quixotic outsider to be ignored; now he?s the man to beat. "For a long time this campaign rightfully ?- and then wrongfully ?- thought the right strategy was to engage Bush," one Gore aide told the New York Times. "Now we have to acknowledge reality." The question is, will Bradley play along? Gore is a proven debater, having aced his stare-downs with Ross Perot and Jack Kemp, and a toe-to-toe could be his best chance to retake the momentum. Bradley, meanwhile, has campaigned as the lanky, unconventional, enigmatic outsider...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Pol Reversal: Gore Goes Gunning for Bradley | 10/1/1999 | See Source »

...conservative on the Fourth Amendment, and they?ve given government a lot of freedom to enact what many consider to be unreasonable intrusions." In the past, explains Sanders, "the court has generally upheld random drug tests when it has perceived an important impact on safety or law enforcement. The question now is: Does random drug testing of welfare recipients serve any important safety or law enforcement rationale?" Stay tuned: Sanders believes that this case may make its way to the Supreme Court, and speculates that despite the court?s current leanings, the Justices may see fit to toss the tests...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Fill Out These Forms... and Fill Up This Cup | 10/1/1999 | See Source »

Previous | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | Next