Search Details

Word: racistly (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

There are, however, a few limiting factors. The Wiesenthal Center is calling attention to two of these in its letter writing campaign. The first concerns web browsers, such as Netscape. These providers could block access to pages they deemed violent or racist. As private companies, they could offer services to the public that simply excluded certain options. This would be akin to a cable company's refusing to offer the Playboy channel as part of its package...

Author: By Ethan M. Tucker, | Title: Regulating Electronic Hate | 1/22/1996 | See Source »

...that raged through college campuses a few years ago, but it has undergone a technological metamorphosis. The current issue is slightly different from its recent cousin. Whereas with verbal speech, the controversy truly concerned only the given campus, Internet hate is accessible the world over. By providing access to racist and anti-Semitic web sites, universities are allowing such material to reach not only their own students but users all over the globe...

Author: By Ethan M. Tucker, | Title: Regulating Electronic Hate | 1/22/1996 | See Source »

...second directly concerns students. Since the Internet is disproportionately available through the nation's universities, the policies set by those universities have tremendous sway over the general public. Georgia State University, for instance, allows racist pages to be posted through its web server with a disclaimer that the views are not necessarily those of Georgia State...

Author: By Ethan M. Tucker, | Title: Regulating Electronic Hate | 1/22/1996 | See Source »

This issue, however, transcends the university. Harvard provides links to hateful, racist and violent sites to many non-academics beyond this campus. Can we hide these links behind the cloak of academic freedom as well, or does Harvard bear responsibility for proliferating this type of material? How much is Harvard a passive agent in the business of information, and how much does it bear moral culpability for the services it provides...

Author: By Ethan M. Tucker, | Title: Regulating Electronic Hate | 1/22/1996 | See Source »

...Cooper claims his letter is very much in keeping with the Constitution and traditional media practice. He argues that the First Amendment also protects publishers who choose not to disseminate materials they find offensive. Most mainstream newspapers and magazines, for example, won't run ads from racist or hate groups. The people who sell access to the Internet, he believes, should start behaving the same way. "In effect," says Cooper, "this is a recognition that the Internet has come of age. We're not looking for prior restraint or to keep these guys off the Internet. We're saying, Adopt...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: MEDIA: HOME PAGES FOR HATE | 1/22/1996 | See Source »

Previous | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 | 273 | 274 | 275 | Next