Search Details

Word: rashly (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...same time, we must avoid rash promises of "liberation," as were made in the 1950's. These only raise false hopes and create animosity toward the United States when they go unfulfilled...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: An Interview With Hubert H. Humphrey | 11/4/1968 | See Source »

...front runner so far is a vaccine named HPV-77 by the virologists who developed it in the Federal Government's Division of Biologies Standards. This has already been tested on more than 20,000 persons and satisfies the three main requirements: 1) although it causes a mild rash in a few vaccinated children, it has no serious side effects; 2) it produces good antibody levels, and therefore immunity, in more than 90% of those vaccinated; 3) the weakened virus in the vaccine does not spread to people who come into contact with those who receive...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Infectious Diseases: Rubella Vaccines | 11/1/1968 | See Source »

...Dartmouth victory proved the spunk of the Yardling harriers. For the second time this season, the freshmen shook off the effects of a previous loss and a rash of injuries to score strongly...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Yardlings to Run In Boston Meet | 10/29/1968 | See Source »

...profession most intimately tied to the war is revealing indeed. They have, of course, expressed their vague, somewhat inarticulate discontent with what is going on "over there." Yet, there is an unmistakable hint of Business As Usual. Throw the CIA out of Harvard? Don't be immature or rash--let's work this out rationally; after all, we want results...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: A 'Moral Purity' Trap? | 10/17/1968 | See Source »

...concern him than people who face less immediate difficulty. I do think, however, that many of us would be willing to exert ourselves more if we were persuaded we could really help. My point about CIA officials at Harvard is not "don't be immature" or "don't be rash," but that this is attacking the wrong guys and not doing any good in what most of us feel is the main task: getting our governmental policy changed. Not that I have the answer, but I don't think this is it. Sincerely, (signed) Ezra F. Vogel

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: A 'Moral Purity' Trap? | 10/17/1968 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Next