Word: readerã
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...part about Harvard: I now know at least two Armenians. They are a delightful people. Worst part about Harvard: June 5, 2009. Describe yourself in 3 words: Castable. Really castable. In 15 minutes you are: Sharing things on Google Reader. In 15 years you are: Sharing things on Google Reader??with my mind...
...Nobody Move.” It’s that when the $2.3 million dollars that kicks around between the characters (you already knew there was some sum, even if you hadn’t been told) goes to the bad guys, the protagonists—and the reader??don’t really care. Subverting a genre obsessed with materialism isn’t exactly difficult, and Johnson doesn’t leave much to work with—but he’s no sadist.—Staff writer Ryan J. Meehan can be reached...
...need to sell. And I don’t mean it in the cynical sense, but its about creating something people want.” “Rolling Stone is not my magazine,” he added. “It’s the reader??s magazine.” Windsor G. Hanger ‘10 asked, “Is there any way to successfully monetize the online presence of a magazine?” Schenk answered that a magazine has to “function like a magazine” and that...
...never actually commits to directing the reader one way or another. His book is designed to amuse, not to inform. Early on, Codrescu expresses a desire to generate Imagination Units (IUs), ideas which will thrive long after the content of the book has melted from the reader??s mind. The idea, while appropriate in the context of Dada, seems misapplied in his work which, however whimsical, relies on specifics more than style. Ultimately, Codrescu’s “Guide” stumbles on its own conceit: Dada prose written by an academic. It?...
...nudges in the side from an academic attempting to relate to the general public. By halfway through the book, when McGinn is still constructing sentences like “fucking has far greater emotional resonance than mere excreting” by way of comparison between mindfucking and bullshit, the reader??s ribs must be getting a little sore.Even when McGinn does turn to more substantive commentary later in his book, it seems to lack depth and direction. There is not much to learn from his facile remark that “Fascism and Soviet Communism...appealed to latent...