Word: reader
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...mail. Do you use Web-based e-mail programs like Gmail or Yahoo! mail? If so, be sure to include the phrase "tags: photos_of_the_year " on a new line at the bottom of the e-mail. We're sorry, but we can only accept one photo per reader. Good luck! By submitting your photo, you hereby grant to TIME and Time.com a non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide license to publish, distribute and exhibit the photo you submit, in any manner and in any medium, without payment to you or any third party. You represent and warrant that you have...
...feeds are streams of data that offer a list of articles on a site or section of a site and update whenever new, relevant information appears online. Through the use of a news reader or Live Bookmark that processes RSS feeds, you can view headlines and article excerpts from multiple sources, all in one place. A few popular news readers are Bloglines, FeedDemon, Pluck or, for Mozilla Firefox users, the Sage RSS reader. Live Bookmarks are a feature of the Firefox and Safari browsers and function much the same as RSS readers...
Fifteen years later, McCarthy has become the co-author of "The Radical Reader: A Documentary History of the American Radical Tradition." He has also co-taught Literature and Arts A-86: "American Protest Literature from Tom Paine to Tupac...
...enjoys a panoramic view of glittering domes and spires. The famous Parisian skyline contrasts with the grimness inside the building these days. Gazing through the room's giant porthole, the paper's foreign editor, François Sergent, sighs. "We could have done better with our readership," he says. Readers seem to agree. Nearly 33 years after Jean-Paul Sartre and a group of Maoist intellectuals [an error occurred while processing this directive] launched their journal in the aftermath of the 1968 Paris riots, Libé - as the left-wing daily paper is dubbed - appears close to death. The title...
...mistakes” in the war and the goal of creating a “smarter” military without ever defining what those terms mean. Do we need more troops? Fewer troops? Targeted assassinations? A strict timetable? The phrases are empty because the authors want the reader to fill them with whatever he or she desires. It’s classic political swindling...