Search Details

Word: recountings (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Professor of Government Michael J. Sandel said he does not believe the U.S. Supreme Court should have reversed the Florida Supreme Court's decision to order a statewide manual recount...

Author: By Robert J. Saranchak, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Bush's Mandate Disputed | 12/14/2000 | See Source »

Clearly, all of the legally-cast ballots in the state of Florida should have been counted; the willingness of both Republicans and Democrats to try to disenfranchise some voters through litigation was startling. In particular, the efforts of President-elect George W. Bush to prevent a statewide recount were disappointing. We believe that this intransigence was born out of a fear that a recount would show that the people of Florida actually chose Gore for the presidency...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Bittersweet Victory | 12/14/2000 | See Source »

...Ginsburg argues convincingly for considering the so-called "deadline" in light of the ultimate goal of the election: equal protection. If votes are disregarded because the U.S. Supreme Court itself stopped the recount and declared an artificial deadline (December 12), isn't that equally unconstitutional as counting undervotes without a uniform standard...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The 'Safe Harbor' Statute: Two Perspectives | 12/13/2000 | See Source »

...December 12 deadline was based on thoroughly specious legal reasoning - so specious that it has led some to declare the decision political in nature. The Supreme Court should never have opened itself up to such accusations; if the majority wanted to guarantee the end of the Florida recount, they ought to have structured their argument around a convincing legal precedent - rather than depending on such a transparent and frail political maneuver and then trying to disguise it as a matter...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The 'Safe Harbor' Statute: Two Perspectives | 12/13/2000 | See Source »

...would he think the Florida Supremes deserved to sail into that safe harbor? The state's high court had tried not once but twice to design a recount scheme that held up to equal protection provisions. Seven Justices said Saturday's count was a failure on those constitutional grounds. A third try might pass muster, it might not, but the way the Florida court had chewed up the past 35 days was certainly no reason to believe that Dec. 18 was any safer. And beyond that date lay constitutional madness not seen since, well...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The 'Safe Harbor' Statute: Two Perspectives | 12/13/2000 | See Source »

Previous | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | Next