Search Details

Word: reiterated (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1990-1999
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...would like to take issue with some of the statements made by Jendi B. Reiter in her column "Noble Principles, Misguided Protests" (February 16 Crimson). First is the assertion that we should accept (or at least sympathize with) the anti-gay policies of the Boy Scouts, the U.S. armed forces and the Ancient Order of Hibernians simply because these groups have "reasons for their opposition to homosexuals...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Reiter's Assertions on Gays Wrong | 3/15/1993 | See Source »

...does the Ku Klux Klan, an organization that Reiter calls "an obvious villain" and does not defend for its views. In fact, the Klan's "reasons" is remarkably similar to the one given by the Hibernians: Biblical condemnation (which remarkably is not so "clear" as Reiter claims) of homosexuality. Most groups said individuals have "reasons" for their views: racial discrimination in the past was often justified because of a belief in the inferiority of non-white peoples, religious arguments against the mixing of races or simply a desire to be free from associating with "that type" of person, a claim...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Reiter's Assertions on Gays Wrong | 3/15/1993 | See Source »

...carriers of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, then, pose such a risk to the citizenry that they should be on the list of excluded? Notwithstanding Reiter's almost laughable claims that "routine contact between [the carriers] and the uninfected community will certainly include sexual activity" and that "intravenous drugs may well become another regular medium of interaction," (italics mine) it is well established that casual contact between persons cannot facilitate the spread of the AIDS virus. In fact, if all unmarried couples just practiced abstention, the favorite Reagan-Bush prescription for the AIDS crisis, these immigrants would pose...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Reiter's Assumptions Don't Hold Up | 2/27/1993 | See Source »

...Reiter also attempts to use an overwhelming assumption to assist her argument when she urges Clinton Administration officials to make a "quick review" of the Declaration of Independence. There, she says, they would find it written that "the government is our creation for our needs, not an independent entity that should follow its own opinion in matters that affect us." Whether the Declaration can really be interpreted in this way is questionable, but it is unquestionable that the Constitution establishes a republic in which the people elect representatives to govern on their behalf. This does not imply the sort...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Reiter's Assumptions Don't Hold Up | 2/27/1993 | See Source »

Along the way, Reiter also takes cheap shots at Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala, whom she calls "a vocal advocate of campus speech codes," and to President Clinton, with reference to the "already battered iamge of our golden-boy president." Any detailed examination of Shalala's record as University of Wisconsin chancellor (not president) would show that far from being a "vocal advocate" of speech codes, she established such a code only very reluctantly after several racial incidents. And as for President Clinton, despite a run of incredibly bad publicity and, I concede, a shaky first few weeks...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Reiter's Assumptions Don't Hold Up | 2/27/1993 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next