Word: repeating
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1910-1919
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...middle of the 18th century it was customary to levy fines for misconduct. Here are some: Absence from prayers, 2d.; tardiness at prayers, 1d.; neglect to repeat sermon, 9d.; absence from professor's public lecture, 4d.; tarrying out of town without leave, not exceeding (per diem) 1s. 3d.; going out of college with- out proper garb, not exceeding 6d.; profane cursing, not exceeding 2s. 6d.; drunkenness, not exceeding 1s. 6d.; tumultuous noises, 1s. 6d.; keeping guns and going skating, 1s.; rudeness at meals, 1s.; fighting, or hurting persons, not exceeding...
...stand as "Stadium." But when the case has been presented with intimate knowledge such as "Stadium" must have had, we cannot keep from joining in the sentiment he has expressed. If it is answered that circumstances differ from year to year, we reply that it is true, but we repeat that the evidence so ably compiled is sufficient to make us fearful. We cannot get around the fact that Yale would tie or lose a dozen other games to win from Harvard; nor can we say that Harvard would not do the same to win from Yale. Our football hopes...
Professor George Pierce Baker '87, is to repeat his Lowell Institute lectures of last winter at the Brooklyn Institute. There are eight of these lectures in the series, entitled "The Drama in the Making," and they will be given every Friday evening during October and November...
...athletes are club house hold words; cannot something be achieved by posting the names of students with honor grades? The faculty also comes in for criticism, especially the "young and generally incompetent" assistants. The professors, it is more than hinted, might do better than give lectures which merely repeat the prescribed reading, and in general, there is felt to be a lack of co-ordination both within and between courses...
...hazy points and give the men a view of their courses as a whole which they are frequently unable to get unassisted. As for omitting reviews for fear of such things as happened in Governmentment I at mid-years, we do not believe that any Harvard man would dare repeat such an act of misrepresentation in the public journals. There is everything to be said in favor of reviews, while what is said against them seems to be not exactly logical...