Search Details

Word: restrictions (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...took President Bush less than two months to break his campaign pledge to restrict carbon-dioxide emissions from coal-fired electric-utility plants, despite widespread scientific agreement that such emissions contribute to global warming [NATION, March 26]. By doing so, Bush also broke another promise--his pledge to restore honesty and integrity to the office of the President. SUZANNE DYER-GEAR Westminster...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Apr. 16, 2001 | 4/16/2001 | See Source »

Bush broke his promise to restrict carbon-dioxide emissions because of the economic cost. I would like to see his face when he receives the bill for 10 times as much in clean-up costs after floods, droughts, submerging coasts, skin cancer, lost crops, etc. Bush seems to have deluded himself into thinking he is not dumping his garbage in his own backyard, but the weather gods do not respect man-made boundaries. Instead of teaching Americans to respect their planet, he is leading them (and everyone else) to future suffering. SHANNON WALLER Barcelona...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Apr. 16, 2001 | 4/16/2001 | See Source »

...clothes have simple lines: loose pants, slip-on shoes, and tank tops and T-shirts that don't restrict movement. "And everything is really, really soft," she says. It's also pretty high-end, for sale at yoga centers but also at such tony boutiques as Bendel's in NY, Harvey Nichols in London, and Barneys Co-op in Chicago. "I don't want to market it as athletic clothing; it really is lifestyle...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: 'I Don't Have a Problem Representing Yoga' | 4/15/2001 | See Source »

...provision or another is thrown out by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. He won. But don't we already have a lamentable experience with severability? In 1976 the Supreme Court threw out one provision of the post-Watergate campaign reform. The court ruled that you can constitutionally restrict how much a candidate can raise but not how much he can spend. That created a gigantic loophole for the very rich. They don't care about restrictions on what they can raise because they don't raise. They have all the money they need. Result? The current epidemic...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Save Us from the Reformers | 4/9/2001 | See Source »

...finishes what federal restrictions began long ago. In 1977, Congress passed the Hyde amendment, banning the use of federal Medicaid dollars for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or if the mother's life is at risk. Since then, states have enjoyed a certain degree of freedom when they move to restrict state Medicare funding of abortions...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Idaho Won't Pay For a Woman's Right to Choose | 4/5/2001 | See Source »

Previous | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | Next