Search Details

Word: roe (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1990-1999
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Thomas may exude moral authority while categorically denying ever asking Hill out or ever talking about sex with Hill, but he exuded that same moral authority while insisting that he has no opintion on Roe v. Wade, or that his heartfelt defense of natural law was nothing but philosophical musings. We didn't believe him then, and we don't believe...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Don't Take Risks | 10/15/1991 | See Source »

CLARENCE THOMAS is fed up. He believes he was tarnished unfairly by the accusations of some Senators that he is evasive and unscholarly and that he dissembled when he claimed to have held no opinion on Roe v. Wade. But instead of criticizing his accusers, Thomas blames his White House handlers. Says a sympathetic Republican who lobbied Senators on Thomas' behalf: "The White House told him to suck up to people and run away from his views. But as he found out, that approach gets you nothing." Not much respect, anyway...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Public Relations Guys Made Me Do It | 10/14/1991 | See Source »

Finally realizing her indiscretion, she clammed up like Clarence Thomas faced with a question about Roe. Can't tell you that, sir; can't even estimate. Further queries got the same kind of neither-confirm-nor-deny blather one usually associates with Kremlin cronies asked questions about Finland...

Author: By Gary J. Bass, | Title: The Last Bastion of Bolshevism | 10/7/1991 | See Source »

...more. Judge Thomas explicitly denies having a constitutional philosophy. Having proclaimed Roe v. Wade the most important constitutional case in the last 20 years, Thomas has tried valiantly to convince the Senate that he has never discussed the case with anyone or even thought about it himself. He seems to believe that he will sit on the highest court in the land only if people believe that he has no legal expertise. And he's probably right...

Author: By Richard A. Primus, | Title: The Old Switcheroo | 10/5/1991 | See Source »

Nobody believes that Thomas, a federal judge, has never thought about Roe, and nobody believes that Gates, as deputy director of the CIA, didn't know what happened in his own organization in the early 1980s. Given the ignorance litmus test, both confirmations are in jeopardy...

Author: By Richard A. Primus, | Title: The Old Switcheroo | 10/5/1991 | See Source »

Previous | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | Next