Search Details

Word: roes (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

After 22 hours of testimony, the 14 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee extracted little from Thomas. He told them the Constitution embraced a right to privacy but refused to offer any thoughts on the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade abortion decision. He did not repudiate his writings favoring the use of "natural law" but said they were the musings of a part-time political theorist and would have no bearing on his interpretation of the Constitution. The Democrats had to admit they were stymied. "Who this man really is, I don't really know," said Herbert Kohl...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Supreme Court: Judging the Judge | 9/23/1991 | See Source »

Weld said his legislation would repeal several now-unenforceable laws that could jeopardize abortion rights if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Roe v. Wade decision...

Author: By The ASSOCIATED Press, | Title: Cardinal Condemns Weld Bill | 9/20/1991 | See Source »

...Roe v. Wade guaranteed abortion rights, but abortion rights supporters are worried that a now more conservative Supreme Court may overturn it or, at the very least, restrict its guarantees of abortion access...

Author: By The ASSOCIATED Press, | Title: Cardinal Condemns Weld Bill | 9/20/1991 | See Source »

Although that case will have no direct impact on Roe v. Wade, there are four disputes pending in the lower courts that pro-lifers hope the Supreme Court will eventually use to either overturn or further limit the landmark 1973 ruling. One of them is Louisiana's tough new antiabortion law, which was struck down by a federal district judge last week...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Abortion: The Feds vs. a Federal Judge | 8/19/1991 | See Source »

...view that Washington's meddling in the Wichita case was, as he put it, "political." Having already made its point in the Operation Rescue case before the Supreme Court, the Administration had no new legal arguments to make other than, apparently, to underline its already well-known distaste for Roe. Vacationing in Kennebunkport, Me., President Bush was asked whether the Justice Department's actions condoned the pro-life pickets' defiance of court orders. Not so, he answered: "Everyone has the right to protest, but it ought to be done within the law." Fair enough. But there is not much doubt...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Abortion: The Feds vs. a Federal Judge | 8/19/1991 | See Source »

Previous | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | Next