Search Details

Word: rotcs (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...most astounding side of the CHUL's decision was the incredible arrogance it implicitly represented. In little over a week, almost half of all Harvard-Radcliffe undergraduates had signed a petition stating that they wanted a referendum on ROTC. The CHUL decided--on the basis of its one student "representative" from every House and one freshman observer--that it would be dangerous to raise the issue of ROTC among undergraduates presumably too unsophisticated to debate those issues in a proper perspective as long as ROTC did not represent any immediate threat. No one on the CHUL has the right...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: CHUL and ROTC | 10/17/1973 | See Source »

...CHUL appeared to be a welcome relief from the inept and self-serving Harvard Undergraduate Council. In its most recent decision, the CHUL has shown itself to be as elitist and undemocratic as any student government of the past. Whether as "private individuals" the members of CHUL favor ROTC is not in question. What is in question is whether undergraduates should have an effective means for raising their collective voice. At the moment, they clearly...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: CHUL and ROTC | 10/17/1973 | See Source »

...MAJORITY opinion editorial on CHUL's refusal to sponsor a student referendum on ROTC voices its abhorrence of that decision in grandiose and self-righteous terms. It brands the committee as "shortsighted, dangerous and anti-democratic," "elitist" and "incredibly arrogant." In a devastating conclusion, it calls on students to vote out those CHUL members "who tried to decide on which matters students should be allowed to express their opinion...

Author: By Leo FJ. Wilking, | Title: The CHUL Was Right | 10/17/1973 | See Source »

...asked the CHUL to sponsor a student poll on the return of ROTC to the Harvard campus, citing President Bok's remarks to alumni in June and agitation over the issue at neighboring universities. NAM submitted petitions signed by 2500 undergraduates in support of its request, but a significant portion of those signatures must have been prompted by NAM's contention that ROTC is indeed an issue at Harvard...

Author: By Leo FJ. Wilking, | Title: The CHUL Was Right | 10/17/1973 | See Source »

...fact, ROTC is not an issue because there are simply no plans to revive it here. Dean Rosovsky told the CHUL that not a single member of the Faculty has broached the subject with him and that he has detected no support for ROTC's return. He added that neither he nor President Bok would even attempt to have the matter discussed by the Faculty...

Author: By Leo FJ. Wilking, | Title: The CHUL Was Right | 10/17/1973 | See Source »

Previous | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | Next