Word: sampson
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Sovereign State of ITT, Sampson...
Behn believed he could contribute to international understanding by constructing global telephone links. Central to ITT's European operations was a German holding company established in 1930. It was inevitable that Behn would have to do business with Hitler. "In trying to hold his system together," writes Sampson, "Behn gradually wove a web of corruption and compromise which left the idealism in ruins." From documents he found in U.S. archives, Sampson concludes that Behn cooperated willingly with the Nazis, choosing not to repatriate his German profits and agreeing to his German subsidiary's purchase of an interest...
...executives at meetings for up to ten days a month. The system is designed to avoid surprises. Ironically but predictably, the vaunted "no surprise" system produced shocks on the political front. Predictably, because most men who are trained to think in quantitative terms are insensitive to nuance and subtlety. Sampson fails to stress this inherent characteristic of business bureaucracies. He also fails to meet the challenge of Geneen's complex personality and conflicting drives...
...some ways, Geneen is close to genius: the management method he has imposed on ITT disciplines and tames territorial chieftains who might otherwise rebel and enables him to check the performance of a widely-almost wildly-diversified company. In other ways Geneen is a gambler on a monumental scale. Sampson neglects this facet of Geneen, although he does show that when Geneen acquired Hartford Insurance he knew full well that the antitrust division of the Justice Department would oppose him. In short, Sampson concludes, Geneen was under the utmost compulsion to try to change the trustbusters' collective mind...
...Sampson's book may be blemished in places by inaccuracy and skewed judgment. ITT has released a 24-page rebuttal which argues that Sampson colored many of his conclusions by quoting sources out of context. Nevertheless, his book is a brisk narrative that raises fundamental questions about the relationships between international business and governments. If Sampson has no final answer, it is because the multinational and conglomerate phenomena are still so new that, beyond profits and losses, corporations do not yet fully comprehend the effects of what they are doing. · R.Z. Sheppard