Word: scoring
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1930-1939
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...that he must be backward, deaf, perhaps defective. But four photographs of Charles Augustus had ever been made public, one of them snapped surreptitiously last summer in Maine when his parents were flying to China. Now there issued forth from Col. Lindbergh's private collection cinema films by the score. These went broadcast through the land by mail, wire, television while enormous headlines splashed the child's name across every U. S. front page day after...
...Score--Lowell 22, Dunster 10. Points--Lowell; Woodard 9, Howard 5, Ferriter 4, Campbell 2, Taylor 2; Dunster: Shumaker 8, Dean, McKain. Personal Fouls--Lowell: Taylor 2, Ferriter, Howard; Dunster: Dean 4, Fuerbringer 2. The summary: LOWELL DUNSTER Ferriter, r.f. l.f., Schumaker Taylor, Campbell, c. c., Wilder Woodard, Burke, l.f. r.f., McKain Howard, r.g. l.g., Plaut Graf, l.g. r.g., Dean, Fuerbringer
...justified in claiming possession of the strongest collegiate team in the east and any and all mythical or actual championships attendant thereto, Boasting a passing attack and stick-handling ability that completely outclasses all their American opponents, the Harvard players exhibited particular prowess in their ability to score goals when circumstances made another marker essential to victory...
...been the attacking plan of the professionals. In the McGill game, however, the Canadians poke-checking often caught the puck at mid-ice, leaving the two Harvard defense men at the mercy of the entire Maple Leaf forward line. In this situation, the second team should theoretically always score and where this continually occurs the primarily defensive team usually wins. Harvard was not long to learn by experience, however, and in subsequent games the Crimson center was made responsible for taking out one of the rival forwards, in the event of failure to get through to the second line...
Yale, more erratic, yet with a better scoring record than the Crimson, chose to adopt practically a five-man defense against her foe, last week-end. These tactics set at naught the almost astonishing team-work of the Harvard forwards and contrived to tire the Crimson players. Harvard undoubtedly showed greater control of the puck, but had it not been for the watchful defense work of Crosby, MacGregor, and deGive, the sallies of Fletcher, Cookman, and Bostwick, might well have skyrocketed the Yale score to a winning figure. Only by sending in Putnam, able puck-carrier, at right defense...