Word: segretti
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...while some two dozen of his agents have already paid the penalty of conviction or face trial for crimes committed in his behalf? If all were pardoned in a grand gesture of healing, what of justice for such as Charles Colson, Egil Krogh, Jeb Stuart Magruder, Herbert Kalmbach, Donald Segretti and the lesser Watergate burglars who already have been imprisoned? What of justice in a historical perspective, when so many have admitted their guilt, if Nixon were allowed to cling to the fiction that he resigned only because he had lost his "political base" in Congress...
...Dennis protested that the President must have personal knowledge of such wrongdoing by his aides if he is to be held accountable for them. But Danielson scoffed at the idea that Nixon would be advised in advance of every improper act. Citing the dirty campaign tricks of Donald Segretti, Danielson asked: "Do you suppose that he... called the President and said, 'Mr. President, I am now about to order 400 pizzas for Mr. Muskie's fund-raiser'? That is unrealistic." It is enough, Danielson contended, to show that an act was set in motion by general presidential...
President: Segretti, and, and the Watergate ... There's no cover-up in this?to this point, period?not one talk of coverup...
Ziegler: Relaying the hang-out in terms of Segretti...
...C.R.P. spokesmen attacked the Post for "character assassination" and "shabby journalism." When the Post told of the wholesale destruction of C.R.P. records?the purpose was to expunge incriminating material?a C.R.P. spokesman said: "The sources of the Post are a fountain of misinformation." The initial stories concerning Donald Segretti's dirty-tricks operation and Segretti's connection to White House Aide Dwight Chapin were denounced as "not only fiction but a collection of absurdities." When Jack Anderson revealed that the White House had decided to "nail" the Post for its exposés, Ziegler called the story "flatly incorrect ? wrong...