Word: seymour
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Nine focused the spotlight on Charlie Spreyer, praising him as a hard-running back. Willoughby, Bartholemy, and Seymour are nominated as the Yale stars. Here's how the experts...
Arthur Sampson of the Herald: "That strong Crimson defence can stop anything the New Haven boys are capable of throwing against it. Harvard should prevail, 7 to 0. I'll be watching Spreyer and Peabody for Harvard; Bartholemy, Seymour, and Burnam for Yale...
Robert F. Magill 3L, Indianapolis, Ind.; Joseph Gold grL, London, England; Seymour Kleinman 3L, New York, N. Y.; Edward G. Howard, Jr. 2L, Wilmington, Del.; Fred W. Peel, Jr. 2L, Danville, Ky.; Hervey C. Allen, Jr. 2L, Rockland, Me.; Donald K. Anderson 2L, Phoenix, Ariz.; Lars H. Bengston 3L, Minneapolis, Minn.; Russell S. Bernhard 3L, Chicago, Ill.; John A. Bowler 3L, Bradford, Pa.; William A. Centner 2L, Battle Creek, Mich,; Howard L. Clark 2L, Altadena, Calif.; John D. Cochran 3L, Pittsburgh, Pa.; John P. Corcoran, Jr. 3L, Rhinebeck...
Clayton J. Clawson ocC is President of the organization. Faculty advisors are:Edward H. Chamberlin, professor of Economics and Chairman of the Department of Economics, John H. Williams, Nathaniel Ropes professor of political Economy and Dean of the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seymour E. Harris, associate professor of Economics, Edward S. Mason, professor of Economics, Abbott P. Usher, professor of Economics. Also Melvin T. Copeland, professor of Marketing and Olyde of O. Ruggles, professor of Public Utility Management of the Business School; and Russell A. Nixon and John D. William, instructors in Economics...
...issue before the colleges is thus squarely put by President Seymour's proposal. Either they should accept his grave view of the situation and gear themselves to a permanent program of military training, or they should accept the operation of the draft in the normal course of events and not change their program at all. In any event, a compromise is useless. A superficial course of lectures will aid no one and merely serves to divert the University's attention from the basic problems of why the war is fought to the mechanical details of how it is fought...