Search Details

Word: sonics (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...listen! In TIME Letters [Dec. 22] are the following people: a farmer who resents not being allowed to go on relief like his city cousins; a blast at sonic booms; a "misunderstood" college student who smokes pot, drinks, and makes out on dates because her parents committed the unforgivable sin of loving, "not listening"; and another college student lamenting the state of the world...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Jan. 5, 1968 | 1/5/1968 | See Source »

...would be hard-pressed to find a competent acoustician, heart specialist or surgeon who would find the startle of the sonic boom acceptable to society. Air routes that avoid populated areas and economists who agree with the FAA are equally rare...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Dec. 22, 1967 | 12/22/1967 | See Source »

Though the Federal Government has already spent upwards of $3,000,000 on research, it has still not decided what strength of sonic boom-if any-will be "acceptable" in populated areas. After the FAA bombarded Oklahoma City with eight booms a day for six months in 1964, three out of four inhabitants said they could tolerate it-but one out of four said he could...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Air: Banning the Boom | 10/6/1967 | See Source »

Servant or Scourge? The most determined opponent of sonic boom-and of the nation's plans to build a supersonic transport (SST)-is Harvard Physicist William Shurcliff, 58, who worked on the atomic bomb with Vannevar Bush, and is now senior research associate at the Cambridge Electron Accelerator. Six months ago, Shurcliff, with nine friends, founded the Citizen's League Against the Sonic Boom, and membership has since grown to 1,320 in 45 states. In letters to members and newspaper ads, Shurcliff has propounded his fears that the SST might ultimately be permitted to fly at supersonic...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Air: Banning the Boom | 10/6/1967 | See Source »

...single SST flying supersonic across the U.S., believes Shurcliff, would trail behind it a bang zone 50 miles wide that could destroy the peace of 20 million Americans. He also argues that competition from cheaper, larger "jumbo jets"-which will produce no sonic boom-could turn the SST venture into "a gigantic boomdoggle" with the taxpayers absorbing most of the loss. "We all believe in progress," he says for his group, "but some things just aren't progress. Aviation should be the servant of man, not his scourge...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Air: Banning the Boom | 10/6/1967 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Next