Search Details

Word: speechã (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...that the publication of these four images, however, is an “affirmation” of free speech dangerously equates the protection of a valuable right with the publication of these particular, offensive cartoons. The Salient’s publication is not a statement of support for free speech??this could have been achieved by a simple statement of affirmation of the Danish paper’s right to publish them—but is instead an expression that the cartoons are themselves a valuable contribution to this discourse. Endorsing the Salient’s decision...

Author: By Paul R. Katz | Title: An Invalid Contribution | 2/21/2006 | See Source »

...president of the Harvard Islamic Society, Khalid M. Yasin ’07, said, “The question here is not about free speech?? it’s about respect...

Author: By Sarah Mortazavi, CONTRIBUTING WRITERS | Title: Interfaith Council Hosts Debate on Controversial Cartoons | 2/17/2006 | See Source »

...Spare Change News advocates for social justice, and having freedom of speech??even that which makes fun of religion—is one of the rights all people should enjoy,” the editorial reads...

Author: By Shifra B. Mincer, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Kidd Warns Salient of ‘Dangerous’ Fallout | 2/16/2006 | See Source »

...fear was so strong that Mass. Hall initially refused even to acknowledge that a tape of the remarks existed, let alone two of them. When those denials proved futile—the tape recorders were plainly visible to the more than 40 academics who heard Summers’ speech??Mass. Hall then argued that a transcript could not be made public because the conference had been off-the-record...

Author: By Zachary M. Seward, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Staff Sought To Shroud Summers | 1/18/2006 | See Source »

...arguments with regard to free speech. They pointed out that even the more liberal members of the court—including Justices Steven G. Breyer and John Paul Stevens—seemed skeptical of Rosenkranz’s claims that the Solomon Amendment amounted to “compelled speech?? and violated the First Amendment. “It looks like the government is going to win the case,” Daniel J. Urman, a third year law student, said. “The justices didn’t buy the free speech argument...

Author: By Paras D. Bhayani, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: HLS Students Predict Loss for FAIR | 12/7/2005 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next