Search Details

Word: staffs (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...staff of Soc Sci 125--a course on "The American Economy: Conflict and Power"--petitioned the CEP for a hearing on the role of grades in their course and at Harvard in general. The Soc Sci 125 petition said that the grading system was "abhorrent," that it created "an undesirable reward structure," and that it promoted an authoritarian relation between students and teachers...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: As Did "Harvard and the City,' | 6/12/1969 | See Source »

...spent $750,000 in his campaign (check the official records or show me better proof), not the two million which Mr. Geoghegan dwelled upon and Mr. Gilligan somehow "knew" we "had" six months before election day. (As proof of our poverty: over 80 per cent of the paid campaign staff, including myself, received no salaries after the month of August.) Mr. Gilligan spent...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: DEFENDING SAXBE | 6/12/1969 | See Source »

...tabulated the results of its mail ballot and said that the department had decided to sponsor Soc Rel 148 and 149 again next year. The department voted to set up an "advisory board" of three Faculty members to oversee the course, but it said that the course's teaching staff would choose the members of the advisory board...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: For the Rest of the Year. | 6/12/1969 | See Source »

September 27: The staff of Soc Rel 148 met for three hours to discuss the "compromise" decision to drop undergraduate sectionmen. Disaffected members of the staff complained that Thomas P. Cottle '59, the course director, had not consulted widely enough before making the decision. They also pointed out potential manpower problems, saying that nine of the course's 16 sections were being led by undergraduates and others not eligible for official appointments...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: In That Memorable Year, 1968-69... | 6/12/1969 | See Source »

...were either misinformed about the background of the ad or else determined to misrepresent the facts. The ad was placed by a member of the University. The CRIMSON business secretary who accepted the ad did not know it was libelous. By the time any of the CRIMSON's editorial staff saw the ad, it had already been printed...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: CRIMSON REPLIES | 6/11/1969 | See Source »

Previous | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | Next