Search Details

Word: starrs (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...lied." He said, "I misled people." Instead of asking forgiveness for betraying his wife and daughter, his staff, his Cabinet and his constituency, he fought back at the independent counsel, Kenneth W. Starr, devoting the second half of the speech to an angry attack, shifting the blame...

Author: By Susannah B. Tobin, | Title: It's Really About Time | 9/11/1998 | See Source »

...discourse," "return our attention to all the challenges and all the promise of the next American century"--a series of thinly veiled imperatives, the scolding teacher again blaming us for having shown an interest in scandal, as if we had fueled the investigation. As if without us or Ken Starr, there would have been no problem...

Author: By Susannah B. Tobin, | Title: It's Really About Time | 9/11/1998 | See Source »

...Starr, not by any means. But his strange and excessive doggedness does not excuse the President for allowing him to find something when he went looking for it. Here is a president whose intelligence, energy and seeming seriousness of purpose endeared him to us, drew us in, made us believe he would help us and the country as a whole. And now, for the last eight months at least, he has failed us. At best, he has wasted our time. At worst, he has betrayed our trust...

Author: By Susannah B. Tobin, | Title: It's Really About Time | 9/11/1998 | See Source »

...just because Starr has sent 36 boxes of evidence to Capitol Hill, but because he'll lie to us again. At the heart of the Lewinsky matter is the simple fact that time and again Clinton has put himself and his desires ahead of the country and its needs. And that is the worst thing a president...

Author: By Susannah B. Tobin, | Title: It's Really About Time | 9/11/1998 | See Source »

...That process will include a resolution by the Henry Hyde-led Judiciary Committee, scheduled to be hammered out Thursday, and full House debate, perhaps as early as Friday. In the meantime, Starr spokesman Charles Bakaly sounded happy to be rid of it. "We have fulfilled our duty," he said, "by providing substantial and credible information that may constitute grounds for the impeachment of the President of the United States." Not surprisingly, the ever-terse David Kendall disagreed. "We do know this," he answered. "There is no basis for impeachment." That judgment, of course, will be made by 435 politically queasy...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Starr Report: Too Hot to Handle | 9/9/1998 | See Source »

Previous | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | Next