Search Details

Word: stormfully (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Neither of these, however, can match Con Ed's record ten years of denials that its proposed Storm King power plant will, if completed, be one of the biggest white elephants ever to trample the power industry, the environment and the consumer...

Author: By Rich Meislin, | Title: Denying Consolidated Edison | 4/25/1974 | See Source »

...Storm King facility would be a pumped storage plant, functioning as a giant storage battery sitting above the Hudson River. Water from the river, pumped up the mountain, would be stored in a reservoir, then released through generators when electricity is in demand. Of course, it takes a considerable amount of energy to push water uphill--more than can be generated by its flowing back down. So the Storm King plant will use three kilowatts of energy for every two it later produces...

Author: By Rich Meislin, | Title: Denying Consolidated Edison | 4/25/1974 | See Source »

...spokesman explained patiently that Con Ed will get the power for Storm King from "cleaner" (thermal and radiation pollution aside) nuclear generating plants. But most of Con Ed's nuclear plants have not been allowed to operate at full capacity-in fact, some have not been allowed to operate at all. If this situation continues, the spokesman assured, the power would be purchased from other members of the Northeast Power Grid. If fuel oil is to be wasted, the reasoning apparently runs, it won't be ours; if the air is to be polluted, atleast...

Author: By Rich Meislin, | Title: Denying Consolidated Edison | 4/25/1974 | See Source »

ASSUMING ONE CAN accept Con Ed's denials that the Storm King plant is conceived entirely on a theory of waste--and that's not easy to do--one can push on to a long series of other disturbing questions. The utility will be more than happy to deny that any of these exist...

Author: By Rich Meislin, | Title: Denying Consolidated Edison | 4/25/1974 | See Source »

When Con Ed originally announced its proposal for the Storm King plant, the cost estimates ranged around $234 million. Now, ten years later, that estimate has risen to $457 million--almost twice the price. Con Ed has denied repeatedly that the facility is any less economical today than it was ten years ago, despite statements from economists and the New York City Environmental Protection Administration to the contrary...

Author: By Rich Meislin, | Title: Denying Consolidated Edison | 4/25/1974 | See Source »

Previous | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | Next