Word: stuarts
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1950-1959
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Harriman-Symington? Recently Frank McKinney, in a private survey for Truman, found that no candidate is strong enough to be nominated on the first ballot. McKinney also reported that he found Missouri's Senator Stuart Symington with enough second-choice support to be the nominee if the convention deadlocks. At first, this did not seem to fit very well with Truman's own announcement that he had decided not to be a member of the Missouri delegation (which will be pledged to Symington) because he wanted to remain a free agent. With the speculation season in swing, however...
Last week as LeMay testified under oath before a Senate Armed Services Sub committee, chaired by Missouri's airwise Democrat Stuart Symington, the capitol rushed to man its security defenses. Symington's committee submitted all of its questions to LeMay in advance. In advance, LeMay wrote out all his answers for the next day's session. In all-night conferences, both questions and answers were reviewed at the Pentagon by an Air Force task force and by a high-ranking Navy security specialist. Of the 153 questions asked during two days' hearings, LeMay answered...
Missouri's Senator Stuart Symington: "If true, the Khrushchev statement is a significant and terrible warning to the American people and the free world...
...bonds were sold by Chicago Financier Harold L. Stuart, 74, who got them for $1,402,200 in 1952 when he floated $6,000,000 in loans to swing the deal that kept the paper out of the Times-Star's hands. It was Stuart's 1952 deal that enabled Enquirer employees to win their campaign to take control of the paper themselves. It was Stuart's impatience with the Enquirer's internal management squabbles (TIME, Dec. 5 et seq.) that prompted him to sell out last week...
...Said Stuart: "The descriptions . . . often resemble old-fashioned Communist caricatures rather than sober presentations of fact." The ambassador then proceeded to cite some sobering facts about Canada-U.S. economic relations: ¶ Rather than increasing to dangerous flood proportions, as some special pleaders claim, the flow of U.S. capital into Canada is actually receding. It was $346 million in 1953, $318 million in 1954, dropped farther in 1955. ¶ Canada's great industrial boom in recent years was neither wholly financed nor owned by U.S. investors. About 85% of the overall expansion was financed by Canadians themselves. Incoming...