Word: submitted
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Harvard currently requires applicants to submit scores from three SAT II tests—which examine mastery of specific subjects rather than general reasoning—in addition to either the SAT I or the ACT tests...
...housing lottery did not always work this way—Harvard undergraduates used to submit housing preferences. In the early nineties, however, it became clear that allowing students to preference their housing choices was fostering sharp divisions within undergraduate life. Most notably, although Harvard was becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, various undergraduate houses were becoming more racially homogenous. This alarmed College higher-ups. To correct for this discrepancy, randomization was born...
...navigate. Over 30 different institutions at Harvard offer thesis research grants to undergraduates, and although a common application exists, it isn’t widley used. Students must provide extensive supplementary materials—in addition to the standard transcript and letters of recommendation, applicants are required to submit a proposal and budget that detail exactly what they intend to research, how they intend to do it, and how much it will cost. Estimating the cost of living in rural China—or wherever research may lead—isn’t an easy task, as Kwong points...
...they undoubtedly hope for a less dramatic finale to the months of research and writing that have gone into the process. Psychology concentrators will have one less hurdle to jump as they turn in their theses electronically—a policy begun in 2006. While History and Literature concentrators submitted their work on Feb. 29, for many thesis writers today represents the final sprint before the official beginning of “senior spring.” When theses are finally finished, students said they are anxious to rid themselves of all reminders of their struggles. Albert D. Genna...
...course of the term. For example, adjustments to course syllabi based on these evaluations could be made on a more frequent basis, and section leaders could alter the tone of discussion during meetings by simply reading anonymous reports from students. Much like the present Q system, students could submit their feedback online, and the Q Guide could even be expanded to show which professors respond well to student feedback. While we certainly understand the criticisms of those who fear that this change would simply add to the already cumbersome bureaucracy at University Hall, we firmly assert that this new program...