Word: supporters
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1900-1909
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...modified rules of football have now had their second season's test, and the result has been tremendously gratifying to all their adherents. Those who still maintain that the former game was the better find very little support, either from the players or the onlookers, and the criticism that is heard is so slight that it is distinctly negligible. It is quite remarkable that such is the case, and still more so that the Rules Committee should have been able to make such sweeping changes in the game with so few mistakes, and these only minor in effect. Naturally every...
...another column this morning the CRIMSON prints a communication that attempts to defend the Junior class for not rallying sooner in support of the Union dance, on the grounds that it is a Union and not a class affair. A few figures readily prove the lack of foundation for this assertion. On January 20 there were 404 Junior members of the Union, and the University Catalogue, which appears today, shows a total enrolment of 467 Juniors in Harvard College and 23 in the Scientific School. Eighty-two per cent of the third year students are members of the Union...
...time for receiving applications to the 1909 Union dance. This is the second time that an extension has been granted owing to the negligence of Junior members of the Union to aid the committee in its work. It seems to me that Juniors should show enough class spirit to support to their fullest extent the only event of the year of its kind. There are still very many men in the class who could easily afford to join the Union and come to the dance, but who are unwilling to do so chiefly because they do not think that...
...speaks for itself. It is painfully apparent from the number of applications for the Union dance that the Junior class is either peacefully slumbering or highly indifferent. In former years the classes have responded far more readily to the dance and have enabled the committees by means of their support to make it a delightful affair. Whether or not the situation this year will be remedied by the disappearance of a somewhat blase attitude in a portion of the class remains to be seen...
...Harvard Theological Review comes, we may be sure, as the servant of the cause dear to Professor Everett. Professors G. F. Moore, W. W. Fenn, and J. H. Ropes, are the Editorial Committee. They have the hearty support of their colleagues in the Faculty of the Divinity School, and it may be added, that they have the good wishes of all serious-minded men, in their endeavor to make this Review the servant of religion pure, catholic, and universal...