Search Details

Word: tag (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Both Gore and his running mate Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) have increasingly questioned Bush's leadership credentials in the closing weeks, especially on the airwaves. A new Gore television advertisement includes the non-discreet tag line: "Is he [Bush] ready to lead America...

Author: By Edward B. Colby, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Swing States, Turnout, Will Decide Election Outcome | 11/6/2000 | See Source »

IMPACT: Depends on the stock market. The $1 trillion price tag means the program may go bankrupt 10 years earlier; to cover the cost, Bush will have to cut benefits. If the market continues its historical rate of return of 7% a year (or even if it gains a more modest 5% a year), such cuts would be painless because the private-account nest egg for most future beneficiaries would more than equal the benefits they would receive under the current system. But there's no benefit floor to protect losers...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Campaign 2000: TIME Issues Briefing: The Four Big Differences | 11/6/2000 | See Source »

IMPACT: The smaller tax cuts are less likely to undermine the surplus. But their targeted nature means not everyone gets a cut and leaves doubts about the total price tag. For example, if enough people take advantage of the savings accounts, the 10-year cost rises $400 billion beyond what Gore has budgeted...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Campaign 2000: TIME Issues Briefing: The Four Big Differences | 11/6/2000 | See Source »

...IMPACT: The smaller tax cuts are less likely to undermine the surplus. But their targeted nature means not everyone gets a cut and leaves doubts about the total price tag. For example, if enough people take advantage of the savings accounts, the 10-year cost rises $400 billion beyond what Gore has budgeted. THE SUPREME COURT GEORGE W. BUSH AL GORE...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Where They Stand: Your Printable Guide | 11/5/2000 | See Source »

...IMPACT: Depends on the stock market. The $1 trillion price tag means the program may go bankrupt 10 years earlier; to cover the cost, Bush will have to cut benefits. If the market continues its historical rate of return of 7 percent a year (or even if it gains a more modest 5 percent a year), such cuts would be painless because the private-account nest egg for most future beneficiaries would more than equal the benefits they would receive under the current system. But there's no benefit floor to protect losers...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Where They Stand: Your Printable Guide | 11/5/2000 | See Source »

Previous | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | Next