Search Details

Word: three-term (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Bush's first term. Unlike Pelosi, a savvy but utterly predictable liberal whom Republicans will delight in caricaturing as a "San Francisco Democrat," Ford would have been, in his own words, "hard to put in a box." Republicans would have had difficulty pigeonholing a black, 32-year-old, three-term Congressman who voted against Bush's tax cuts but in favor of such conservative perennials as the prayer-in-school and anti-flag burning constitutional amendments and repeal of the death tax. He thinks it's time for Democrats to stop "telling people what they already know" about the shortcomings...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Harold Ford Jr. Reaches For the Stars | 12/10/2002 | See Source »

Johnson, who has served 10 terms, and Maloney, a three-term incumbent, are both moderates who share many of the same views on issues...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Congressional Races With a Crimson Tint | 11/4/2002 | See Source »

Rockefeller, a three-term incumbent, took 77 percent of the vote when he last ran for reelection in 1996. But Wolfe points to George W. Bush’s narrow victory in the state in 2000 as evidence that...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Congressional Races With a Crimson Tint | 11/4/2002 | See Source »

...lose. In a reprise of Election 2000, it fell to the courts--including the Supremes--to decide whether this is a legal way to play the game. But Torricelli's decision was the first good news the Democrats have had in weeks, since his designated replacement, Frank Lautenberg, a three-term Senate veteran, brings lots of advantages. He's a multimillionaire who can pay his own way; 9 out of 10 voters recognize his name, a plus in a state where advertising is pricey; and his G.O.P. opponent, businessman Douglas Forrester, loses his greatest distinction--not being Torricelli. By week...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Election 2002: Battle For The Senate | 10/14/2002 | See Source »

...lose. In a reprise of Election 2000, it fell to the courts - including the Supremes - to decide whether this is a legal way to play the game. But Torricelli's decision was the first good news the Democrats have had in weeks, since his designated replacement, Frank Lautenberg, a three-term Senate veteran, brings lots of advantages. He's a multimillionaire who can pay his own way; 9 out of 10 voters recognize his name, a plus in a state where advertising is pricey; and his G.O.P. opponent, businessman Douglas Forrester, loses his greatest distinction - not being Torricelli. By week...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Battle for the Senate | 10/7/2002 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next