Word: transcripts
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
According to statistics complied by the Boston Transcript, Cornell holds the athletic supremacy for the academic year 1910-1911. This is the first time since Cornell has entered intercollegiate athletics that she has acquired this position. By winning the championship in five separate sports the Ithacans have beaten the total of 4 1-2 made by Yale, and exceeded anything ever done in this country. Counting each sport as one pint the scores of the first eight institutions follow: Cornell 5, Yale 4 1-2, Harvard 2, Princeton 2, Columbia 1, Pennsylvania 1, Haverford 1, and the Navy 1. Sport...
...West Boston drawless bridge and the Charles River dam and since then progress has been more rapid. One by one the obstacles have been surmounted, and now there is almost a certainty that a fine new bridge will span the river before another year has passed.--Boston Transcript...
...Winter of the department of Public Speaking will preside at the debate and the judges have been selected as follows: J. Q. Dealey, Professor of Political Economy at Brown University; G. W. Scott; Professor of International Law at Columbia University; and F. B. Tracy, editor of the Boston Transcript...
...Place and I. Witkin; against Princeton--I. Levin, G. V. Seldes and R. L. West. The judges have been selected as follows: J. Q. Dealey, Professor of Political Science at Brown University; G. W. Scott, Professor of International Law at Columbia University; F. B. Tracy, Editor of the Boston Transcript. Professor I. L. Winter, of the department of Public Speaking will preside. A. N. Levin has been appointed manager of the team and R. A. Newman, assistant manager. Freshmen who have subscribed to their class debating funds will receive reserved seat tickets for the debate. Other Freshmen desiring reserved seats...
...serve its own ends. E. W. Westcott states it as a fact that the reason why the "editor-in-charge" refused to print a certain communication by H. J. Seligmann was because, on the editor's admission, "the CRIMSON wanted 'to get back at the writer in the Transcript and did not care for discussion of the general principle.'" That the president of the CRIMSON should make such an admission even though impelled by such a reason seems an absurdity. I was therefore not surprised to hear, on asking the president, that he had never made such a statement...