Search Details

Word: trumaning (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Early in his freshman year, long before he was named a Truman Fellow, Amar C. Bakshi ’06 had an experience that today he says helped define his academic career...

Author: By Matthew S. Blumenthal, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Junior Wins Truman Scholarship | 4/19/2005 | See Source »

Three years later, Bakshi seems to have found his focus by blending his diverse interests in art, social theory, and public service—and the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation has taken note...

Author: By Matthew S. Blumenthal, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Junior Wins Truman Scholarship | 4/19/2005 | See Source »

...successful Alamogordo test reached Potsdam, top American officials began to view the Bomb as a way to avoid the need for Soviet involvement in the Pacific war, rather than viewing Soviet involvement as a way to avoid the need for the Bomb. Secretary of State James Byrnes, Truman's closest confidant on atomic matters, was eager to "get the Japanese affair over before the Russians got in" and felt that knowledge of America's new weapon would make the Soviets "more manageable." Secretary of War Henry Stimson, perhaps the most respected U.S. statesman of the century, was wary of using...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Essay: Why Did We Drop the Bomb? | 4/18/2005 | See Source »

...decision to proceed with the atomic bombing was that none of America's leaders felt any urgency about finding a way to avoid it. The scientists had not stressed that their creation might unleash radioactive fallout that would make the Bomb a more sinister weapon than even chemical warfare. Truman and his advisers knew that the explosion would be phenomenally large, but considered it no more morally repulsive than the massive fire-bombing raids that had cremated much of Tokyo. Stimson, the man who wrestled most with these imponderables, called the Bomb "the most terrible weapon ever known," but even...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Essay: Why Did We Drop the Bomb? | 4/18/2005 | See Source »

...decision, then, was from their vantage simple. If Truman had not used the Bomb, how could he have explained it to the families of the boys who would subsequently have died, be it 40,000 of them or a million? How could he have justified continuing the war, transferring weary G.I.s to the Pacific to prepare for an invasion, proceeding with the grotesque fire bombings and allowing the Kremlin to expand its grip in the Far East when he had spent $2 billion on a weapon that could produce a quick end to the conflict...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Essay: Why Did We Drop the Bomb? | 4/18/2005 | See Source »

Previous | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | Next