Word: unborn
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
This ban is not about women’s health; it is not about saving unborn “children;” it is not even about moral choices according to particular religious traditions. The overarching goal of most anti-abortion activists is to reinstate traditional family structures and gender roles they believe have broken down in the United States during the past half-century, while aiming to prevent a shift in women’s status abroad by opposing the distribution of contraception and abortion services through international aid. This ban is misogynist, its proponents are dishonest...
...only have those at Harvard exhibited a bias against pro-life groups, but the national media has as well. Last January over a hundred thousand people came from all parts of the United States to Washington, D.C. to support the dignity of mothers and unborn babies in the annual March for Life. In the news after the march, the media’s bias became apparent. “Pro-life” people were “anti-abortion” while the other side was graced with the comfortable “pro-choice...
...life” people are really just that. We aren’t just opposed to abortions; we care about the lives of the elderly, the unborn and the handicapped. To label us “anti-abortion” (though we certainly do believe that abortions end lives and so are opposed to them) inaccurately restricts our mission and portrays us in a negative light. The disproportionate media attention given to “pro-choice” advocates, the refusal to even mention the overwhelming number of pro-lifers and the focus given to those in favor...
...abortion advocates also maintain that Roe helped prevent pro-lifers trying to impose their morality on others. If it were not proved that the unborn are fully human, pro-abortion advocates would be justified in their claim. But since the unborn are fully human, women receiving abortions infringe upon the right to life of the unborn and thus force their morality upon others as well...
...horrifying to realize that because of one Supreme Court case, the fetal holocaust is hidden behind misleading euphemisms. Instead of saying that we murder unborn children, Roe has enabled us to say that we “abort fetuses” at the rate of 4,400 a day. The lady next door would never pay an abortionist to murder her unborn son. All she did was eliminate the “product of conception” because she did not want to subject her inconvenient offspring to an impoverished life. The legacy of Roe vs. Wade makes her decision...