Word: univacs
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Remington Rand's electronic calculator, Univac (see RADIO & TV). But the Detroit Times did better with Univac's cousin UDEC (Unitized Digital Electronic Computer). By carefully feeding UDEC the vote from key districts, the Times predicted that Democrat Patrick McNamara would win over Republican Senator Homer Ferguson, even though Ferguson's defeat was not certain until eight or nine hours later...
Probably the outstanding TV casualty of the night was Univac-the giant electronic brain built by Remington Rand and used by CBS to project early returns into estimates of final results. Everybody remembers how Univac predicted a Republican landslide early in the 1952 presidential election and how CBS kept the prediction dark. As a result, Univac was scooped by the returns themselves...
Last week, possibly in revenge, Univac turned Democrat with a vengeance and predicted a Republican disaster: shortly after 9 p.m., Univac claimed that the Democrats would win a majority of 64 seats in the House and 23 in the Senate...
...hours later the machine completely reversed its field. Commentator Charles Collingwood, who nursemaided the mechanical brain both in 1952 and last week, says: "Suddenly Univac said the Republicans were winning the House. We didn't know what to do. Should we change the machine? After all, last time the experts were wrong. I decided to stick with the machine." This particular error turned out to be caused by human frailty: a teletype operator had transposed the Democratic and Republican figures...
...Univac's mistaken idea that a Democratic sweep was in the making, Collingwood thinks it resulted from the fact that the first two states to report-Delaware and Connecticut-showed a heavier Democratic vote than was true of the national scene. Explains Collingwood, defensively: "After all, Univac is only human-that is, it can only make predictions based on the material that humans feed into it." Collingwood asked an attendant mathematician if he could explain what went wrong, and got the Einsteinian answer: "It may be in the taxability of the K factor...