Search Details

Word: used (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Your advocacy of "police calm" in the face of "verbal provocation," "filthy abuse," and "language, however violent" is irresponsible and ridiculous. To justify such acts in the name of the First Amendment is just absurd. Surely you must know that the law prohibits the use of obscene language in public places, disorderly conduct, violent language, and interfering with a police officer in the exercise of his duty. You might as well defend the shouting of "Fire!" in a crowded theater...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Oct. 18, 1968 | 10/18/1968 | See Source »

...last week, students at his old high school demanded that his portrait be removed from a hallway. Why had the general interrupted his California retirement? "The whole country is drifting away from the principles that made America great," he says. In the past add: LeMay "the country had to use unorthodox methods to get out of the hole, and I think we're in that situation now. His critics charge that the "unorthodox method might employ is the H-bomb, and he has often sounded as if that is what he means. Not in regard to Viet...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Nation: BOMBER ON THE STUMP | 10/18/1968 | See Source »

...Catonsville Nine did, however, use some highly unusual arguments. They contended that "some property has no right to exist," namely the draft files, because they were instruments of an illegal war. They argued that they had broken one law in order to halt what they believed was a greater act of outlawry. But Chief Judge Roszel C. Thomsen underlined the distinction between the pacifists' motives and their admitted intent to commit the crime of destroying government property and interfering with the administration of the Selective Service system. It was of no legal significance, Thomsen told the jury "that...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Draft: No Regrets | 10/18/1968 | See Source »

Morally, a scholar is, quite simply, responsible for the ultimate "use" to which his work is put. There is no room for complaints of misuse when the "output" is so painfully evident in the forms of support for Chiang Kai-shek, containment of Communist China, and the application of scholarship in Vietnam, etc., etc. Logically, those who have contributed to the making of China policy are obligated to make public their part in that sad misadventure and take the knocks that are assuredly coming. More people than Dean Rusk are due credit for the past decade's debacle--lots...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: A 'Moral Purity' Trap? | 10/17/1968 | See Source »

Radcliffe apparently doesn't understand that it has a labor problem on its hands that can only get worse. The near-strike of last week should show the College that it must eliminate its wasteful use of labor. One Harvard student pointed out that the girls won't be happy about having to cook for themselves. But even cooking beats not being able to afford Radcliffe...

Author: By Deborah R. Waroff, | Title: Labor Pains | 10/17/1968 | See Source »

Previous | 284 | 285 | 286 | 287 | 288 | 289 | 290 | 291 | 292 | 293 | 294 | 295 | 296 | 297 | 298 | 299 | 300 | 301 | 302 | 303 | 304 | Next