Search Details

Word: validator (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...argue that if all Frenchmen had behaved like Paul, then the deportation could never have taken place? Or does he want to show that Paul's failure to save anyone indicates the futility of his action? Both positions are implied in the film and both, perhaps, are partially valid, but to consider the issue in these terms is misleading. The sources of collaboration and resistance must be sought in a perspective which transcends the level of purely individual motivations...

Author: By Jonathan Zeitlin, | Title: The French Occupation and the Jews | 5/23/1975 | See Source »

Some of the Asian nations he cited nonetheless have valid reasons for fearing that the Communist victories have created not just ripples but potential shock waves. Laos is already feeling the impact (see story page 28); Korea could be next, in the opinion of many South Koreans. "It is obvious that the Communists will attempt to create another Indochina situation in the Korean peninsula," noted a resolution adopted last week by the [South] Korean Newspaper Association. North Korean Dictator Kim II Sung has done nothing to alleviate the South's fears; in Peking last month he warned that...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: DIPLOMACY: The Importance of Sounding Earnest | 5/19/1975 | See Source »

Principles established at the end of World War II--that war crimes exist and people can be held accountable for them--are still valid, but the United States government is in no position to put them into practice. For the government to screen out "undesirables" is more like Nazi Germany managing to survive the war and then denying refuge to Quisling or Laval on the grounds that they were undemocratic. If principles established after World War II were used today, justice for war crimes in Vietnam and Cambodia would be administered by the victorious governments in those countries...

Author: By Anemona Hartocollis, | Title: Who Should Cast The First Stone? | 5/15/1975 | See Source »

Wendt's defense was led by Lawyer and Lay Theologian William Stringfellow, who harbored Daniel Berrigan in 1970 when the Jesuit was a fugitive from the FBI. Stringfellow was interested in pursuing what he felt was a vindicating factor in Wendt's action-the validity of the women's ordinations. The national head of the church, Presiding Bishop John M. Allin, who was subpoenaed for the defense, refused to appear; as a result, at week's end he was cited for contempt by the five-judge ecclesiastical court. That left as the star witness his predecessor...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Religion: Disobedience on Trial | 5/12/1975 | See Source »

Robert G. Wiltsey, head of the LSAT division at ETS said yesterday the test would have been valid had Holmberg required the test takers to remain in their seats while the test was halted for 35 minutes...

Author: By Judith Kogan, | Title: Invalidation of Harvard LSAT Requires 250 to Repeat Exam | 4/23/1975 | See Source »

Previous | 372 | 373 | 374 | 375 | 376 | 377 | 378 | 379 | 380 | 381 | 382 | 383 | 384 | 385 | 386 | 387 | 388 | 389 | 390 | 391 | 392 | Next