Word: validator
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...prove that the committee in the 1955 inquiry was not engaged in its primary purpose, that the investigation in the entertainment field did not perform a valid legislative function, that from all the hearings on entertainment since 1947 no legislation emerged, and that the purpose of the inquiry was to single out and expose individuals in order to deny them employment. Ross said also he intended to prove through Walter's testimony that the HUAC was "engaged in indiscriminate dragnet procedures...
...Pete Seeger's rights under the first amendment were violated, and he had the right to say the questions were invalid. The investigation did not serve any valid legislative purpose. There was no question of national security involved, or of over-throwing the government by force or violence...
...Committee's reasons for its stand are, for the most part, valid. It observed that a new sophomore has many opportunities not offered to a normal incoming freshman. For instance, he can get waiver of the Gen Ed A requirement, exemption from lower-level Gen Ed courses and from Physical Training, immediate assignment to a House, and concentration in the first year of residence. But, the SCCEP report charges with complete accuracy, "the Advanced Placement tests, the present criteria for Sophomore Standing, do not measure quantities relevant to these privileges...
...with equal fervor in the newspapers and magazines. is disagreement about the thin the Harvard Faculty. pute centers around three . First, does the fact that was kidnapped on Ar territory--in the absence xtradition treaty covering and military crimes--un the competence of the ourt? Second, does a valid sis for that competence view of the fact that Eich crimes were committed on Israeli soil nor at a time State of Israel existed? d, is there a sound moral the trial: were his crimes ed against the Jewish peo humanity, and, if the does the State of Israel the Jewish...
...weighed by the absence of plausible alternatives. "The choice," Morgenthau goes on, "is between doing nothing, which would be an outrage to our sense of justice, and doing something, admittedly questionable from a legal point of view and unsatisfactory in moral terms." He concedes the possibility of "devising more valid proceedings than those which are now in prospect," although "I would not count an international tribunal among them." But he submits that "what is being done is morally less unsatisfactory than to have done nothing...