Word: voting
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Besides Seiler, a Computer Science concentrator who has worked at Google, none of the remaining UC members considered themselves particularly knowledgeable about electronic vote tampering...
Seiler then took an oral vote to certify the results. According to Osborne, one of the EC members who later resigned, there were no voices of dissent at the time, resulting in a successful certification...
...appearance’s sake, all was as it usually was. Voting had closed at noon that day, and the results had been certified by an oral vote of five of the seven-member Commission—which oversees the elections each year—six hours later. But after a few minutes of squabbling, Commission Chair Brad A. Seiler ’10 relocated the gathering to the Science Center for an impromptu meeting...
...midnight, Seiler and two other Commission members had abruptly resigned their posts, an e-mail to the Undergraduate Council open list (UC General) signed by the UC Vice President questioned the validity of the voting results and suggested possible vote tampering, and the presidential ticket of John F. Bowman ‘11 and Eric N. Hysen ’11, celebrating in its Pforzheimer belltower headquarters after the Crimson Web site erroneously announced their victory, had to be told that things were far from decided...
Three days after the ending of the closest Undergraduate Council presidential election in recent history, while the student body’s chief governing organization finalizes plans to pass judgment on vote tallies that remain decertified today, a series of interviews by The Crimson shed some light on the events that led to Friday’s confused outcome and the questions that may define the discourse on what remains to be done...