Word: whoever
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...After a 30-minute delay and an unsuccessful search of the stands, Goalie Jacques Plante replaced Parent in the Maple Leaf lineup. But no sooner had play resumed than a new melee broke out, with players from both benches spilling onto the ice and pounding on whoever was handy. Final score: Maple Leafs 18, Rangers 15 penalties...
This apparently indicated that Nixon was being frustrated by lower officials at the State and Defense departments who wanted a more evenhanded approach. The secret minutes later reported: "Dr. Kissinger said that whoever is putting out background information is provoking presidential wrath. The President is under the illusion that he is giving instructions, not that he is merely being kept apprised of affairs...
...made coolly; and if you respond in hot blood, you cannot make good decisions. And I like a clean room. This desk is always clean. Of course, if I'm writing a speech, I'm surrounded by a pile of papers as I sit stiffly thinking and concentrating. But whoever is in this office cannot afford to be undisciplined. He must live like a Spartan. You have to save yourself, be at your best, be physically and mentally disciplined to make decisions in a balanced way. I would not think of making a decision by going around the table...
Both teams have strong individual talent, and are evenly matched in most of the specialty strokes, the dive, and the individual medley. Whoever wins the relays will probably win the meet, and intangibles such as coaching, mental attitude, and preparation may provide the margin of difference between the two teams. Navy has a far superior team to Army's, and the result of the meet may reveal a great deal more about Harvard's season prospects...
...test. Not only is the behavior of the SDS reprehensible in its own right, but it is essentially irrelevant to the issue. To allow this subject to be fought out at this level is to accept the proposition that the substantive issues involved are unimportant or meaningless, and, whoever "wins." this would further weaken the position of the forces of legitimate scholarship and intellectual freedom. It is, as I say, encouraging to find that there are 107 courageous members of the academic community who recognize the paramount importance of the substantive issues involved and their implications for public policy...