Word: whose
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1880-1889
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Your correspondent asks why we said nothing about others "whose tactics were precisely the same as those of the gentleman alluded to." If our purpose had been, as your correspondent asserts, to make a "violent personal attack" on any or all of the contestants, perhaps we should have mentioned the names of all those gentlemen who seemed to us to have passed over the bounds of scientific sparring into the province of "slugging." But as our criticism was directed towards the sparring itself, we mentioned only the name of the gentleman whose sparring would illustrate most clearly the objectionable features...
Prof Morse of Salem, whose lectures on Japan are so popular, and whose collection of Japanese pottery is well known, visited the college yesterday with three or four Japanese young...
...without having a good command of the facts. Again, I think that a paper which does this, should be at least consistent in its procedure. Why does it not name the gentleman who misbehaved in the wrestling? Why does it say nothing about the gentlemen in the first meeting whose eactics were precisely the same as those of the gentleman alluded to, although without the same effect? Why does it not admit that there was another gentleman in the light-weight who also "slugged" to the full extent of his powers, and also possessed but very little science? The facts...
...officers of the meeting were: Referee, G. B. Morison, '83; Judges, W. Soren, '83, and A. C. Denniston, '83 The officers of the association for this year to whose efforts the success of the meetings are due are: President, C. H. Atkinson, '85; Vice-President, A. T.French, '85; Treasurer, R. D. Smith '86; Secretary, H. L. Clark, '87; Stewards, J. E. Thayer, and W. R. Trask, '85, W. Baker, and F. S. Parker, '86; J. S. Russell, and F. Remington; 87, C. Amory and F. G. Balch...
...senate is not supposed to create business for itself; and like the nation whose happiness it is to have no annals, Amherst has been singularly free from all disturbing questions for some years past. Only one case of discipline has occurred during the existence of the senate; the question of athletics or no athletics was settled soon after the body's organization; and in fact the senators have done but little more at their stated meetings than to pass congratulations with the president on the prevailing harmony of the college. This accounts in a large degree for the embryo state...