Word: yales
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1920-1929
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...yard dash--Two men in each heat qualified for semifinals. First heat--won by Daley (Holy Cross); second, Kent (Colgate); third, T. F. Mason '30. Time-9-4-5 sec. Second heat--won by Kieselhorst (Yale); second, Sachs (Penn); third, Finn (Boston College). Time--10 1-5 sec. Third heat--won by Bowen (Pittsburgh); second, Kastler (Penn); third Andrews (Princeton). Time--9 9-10 sec. Fourth heat--won by Harwood (Syracuse); second, Dyer (Stanford); third, MacDonald (Yale). Time--10 sec. Fifth heat--won by Maurer (Southern California); second, Wildermuth (Georgetown); third, Stevens (Dartmouth). Time--10 1-10 sec. Heat...
...yard dash--Three men in each heat qualified for semifinals. First heat--won by Kent (Colgate); second, Kastler (Penn); third, MacDonald (Yale). Time--21 9-10 sec. Second heat--won by Wildermuth (Georgetown); second, Wehner (Southern California); third, Morin (Holy Cross). Time-21 8-10 sec. Third heat--won by Engle (Yale); second, Harwood (Syracuse); third, Mason. Time--22 sec. Fourth heat--won by Dyer (Stanford); second, Sacks (Penn); third, Gill (Yale). Time...
...yard high hurdles--Three men in each heat qualified for semifinals. First heat--won by Collier (Brown); second, Furth (N.Y.U.); third, Smith (Stanford); fourth, Clark (Cornell). Time--14 4-5. Second heat--won by McCoy (Penn); second, Nichols (Stanford); third, Devoe (Yale); fourth, Young (Cornell). Time--15 1-5 sec. Third heat--won by Edmonds (Stanford); second, Webber (Southern California); third, Putnam (Dartmouth); fourth, Stollwerck (Colgate). Time--15 1-10 sec. Heat for fourth men (one to qualify for semifinals). Won by Stollwerek (Colgate). Time...
...fact that Ingraham won all but one of his doubles matches is an evidence of the tennis strategy which made this year's season so successful. Meeting the strong-Eastern teams, Columbia, N. Y. U., Penn, Williams, and Yale, Harvard would usually lose two or three of the singles matches to the luminaries of the opposing team, Yale's Ryan and Luce, Penn's Stanger and Lavine, William's Wolf and Chase, N. Y. U.'s Harte and Tarangoli as the case might be. But meeting the same men paired in the doubles matches, the Harvard team would come back...
Besides this immediate necessity, Harvard seems to have much the same problem as the other eastern universities, most of which like Yale and Dartmouth, have flourishing personnel departments. It may be argued that Harvard, because, of its location, or some tradition of individualism, has less need of vocational guidance. This point of view, however, seems a confusion of the question, in that more opportunities for placement are not sufficient to guide undecided Seniors in choosing a place. The problem, in other words, is bigger than local differences and is apparently becoming more pressing in proportion as the opportunities open...