Search Details

Word: yankelovich (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...reason for the candidates' caution was clear: although the polls continue to give Carter an edge, it is extremely narrow. A new TIME-Yankelovich survey for Oct. 16 to 19, updated after the debate, showed Carter leading the incumbent by 4%-48% to 44%, with 8% still undecided. Before the debate, the figures had been 45% for Carter, 42% for Ford, with 13% undecided. The Harris/ABC poll had precisely the same pre-debate spread between the two major candidates-45% to 42% for Carter, with 5% for Independent Candidate Eugene McCarthy, 1% for Lester Maddox and 7% undecided...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE CAMPAIGN: AVOIDING A KNOCKOUT IN THE CLOSING ROUNDS | 11/1/1976 | See Source »

...debate probably did not persuade many voters to switch from one candidate to the other. Most surveys, however, gave Carter the edge in the final confrontation. In a snap poll by Yankelovich, 33% rated Carter the winner, 26% Ford, and 41% called it a tossup. A Roper survey for the Public Broadcast Service showed Carter the clear winner by 40% to 29%, with 31% viewing the encounter as a standoff. On the other hand, an Associated Press telephone sample of 1,027 voters gave Ford the victory, 35.5% to 33%. The A.P. sample also gave Ford the edge over Carter...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE CAMPAIGN: AVOIDING A KNOCKOUT IN THE CLOSING ROUNDS | 11/1/1976 | See Source »

...RECENT ARTICLE in the New Republic, public opinion analyst Daniel Yankelovich explained that in the last few weeks of the presidential campaign a large number of voters will be focusing their decisions. The voters, Yankelovich suggests, are essentially satisfied with their judgment of Gerald Ford as a man of openness, decency, honesty and straight-forwardness. While it is not clear that this judgment will play a key role in the voters' decision, it stands in sharp contrast to their perception of Jimmy Carter as a man of mystery, even after the two months of post-Labor Day campaigning...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: The Pathetic Lie of Jerry Ford | 10/30/1976 | See Source »

Inner Conflict. Yankelovich stresses that a few days' difference in the polls can account for sizable variations. He also contends that there are two types of electorates: one that makes its mind up and stays put, as in 1972, when 60% of the voters had decided to support Richard Nixon before Labor Day; and the 1976 voters, who "are very unsure," torn by "inner conflicts" and who thus respond to a Ford gaffe one day, a Carter gaffe the next. "People are uneasy about Carter and find Ford an acceptable alternative," says Yankelovich. He emphasizes, as do Gallup...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OPINION: Those Fluttering, Stuttering Polls | 10/25/1976 | See Source »

Those are the chief conclusions of the second TIME Citizens' Panel conducted by the public-opinion research firm of Yankelovich, Skelly and White, Inc. Last month TIME published the results of the first survey, taken among 300 voters chosen at random from a national cross section of 1,500 people. To examine the changing-or unchanging -reactions to the campaign, Yankelovich went to 303 other voters between Oct. 8 and 10, after the second debate...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: TIME CITIZENS' PANEL: Support with Serious Reservations | 10/25/1976 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | Next